Q: Science can never be challenged. It extends only...
A: What is Science? A model of learning based upon the principles of logic. What is logic? A discussion / dialogue between opposing concepts. What is concept? A thought, - A formula in words ? What is word? The direct expression of the consciousness associated with a body / organism. Science is supported by logic / Mathematics. But Mathematics is supported by concepts. Again 0 and 1 too are but true as concept only. Because 'number' is itself an idea. The underlying consciousness-principle / devatA / Ganesha is the self-evident Reality which no one could ever deny / refute. Where stands than the 'science'? At what foot-hold upon?
Therefore Vedanta or Sanatana-dharma texts don't even insist that The Supreme-Being is one or many. Though they admit The Supreme-Being is unique / विलक्षण in the sense that it is indescribable. And though It could be attained and Realized too in a way, one can never claim he has known the Supreme Being.
sAMkhya (sankhyA) starts with 1.
And asserts that 1, the 'purush' is the only Reality.
Vedanta however insists that 1 itself is a formal notion only.
Because the Reality is indivisible, The one who says '1' has no his own independent existence from the Supreme Being.
--
A: What is Science? A model of learning based upon the principles of logic. What is logic? A discussion / dialogue between opposing concepts. What is concept? A thought, - A formula in words ? What is word? The direct expression of the consciousness associated with a body / organism. Science is supported by logic / Mathematics. But Mathematics is supported by concepts. Again 0 and 1 too are but true as concept only. Because 'number' is itself an idea. The underlying consciousness-principle / devatA / Ganesha is the self-evident Reality which no one could ever deny / refute. Where stands than the 'science'? At what foot-hold upon?
Therefore Vedanta or Sanatana-dharma texts don't even insist that The Supreme-Being is one or many. Though they admit The Supreme-Being is unique / विलक्षण in the sense that it is indescribable. And though It could be attained and Realized too in a way, one can never claim he has known the Supreme Being.
sAMkhya (sankhyA) starts with 1.
And asserts that 1, the 'purush' is the only Reality.
Vedanta however insists that 1 itself is a formal notion only.
Because the Reality is indivisible, The one who says '1' has no his own independent existence from the Supreme Being.
--
No comments:
Post a Comment